No More Fraud Vampires: Whistleblowers Put a Stake in Phlebotomy Unlawful Kickback Scheme

31 October 2024. Two whistleblowers “stopped the bleeding” caused by an alleged kickback scheme perpetrated by a mobile phlebotomy service based in California. Veni-Express, Inc. and its owners have agreed to pay $135,000 to settle allegations of violating the Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act. While the award for the two whistleblowers has not yet been determined, False Claims Act qui tam whistleblowers may be rewarded between 15-25% of the settlement.

Overview of the Case

According to the allegations, from 2015 to 2019, Veni-Express allegedly submitted false claims to federal health care programs for services that were not actually performed. These services included venipuncture procedures during homebound patient visits and non-reimbursable travel mileage claims for the visits. The fraudulent activities were reportedly conducted with the oversight of the company’s owners, Myrna and Sonny Steinbaum.

Additionally, between July 2014 and June 2015, Veni-Express allegedly paid unlawful kickbacks to Altera Laboratories, also known as Med2U Healthcare LLC, to market their services. These kickbacks were disguised as a percentage of company revenue.

Unlawful Kickbacks and Phantom Billing

The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is a federal law that prohibits healthcare providers from offering, soliciting, or receiving anything of value to induce or reward referrals for services covered by federally funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. When providers violate the AKS, they compromise patient care by prioritizing financial gain over medical necessity, which can lead to unnecessary, costly, or substandard treatments. Phantom billing, which involves charging Medicare and Medicaid for services never provided, drains funds that could otherwise be used for essential care for beneficiaries. It leads to increased healthcare costs, putting a strain on federally funded healthcare programs and potentially causing cuts or restrictions in services. This fraudulent practice also erodes trust in the healthcare system, which can prevent beneficiaries from seeking the care they need. As the Special Agent in Charge for the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General said about the case, “Improper incentives and billing Medicare for services never actually provided divert taxpayer funding meant to pay for medically necessary services for Medicare enrollees.”

Settlement Details

The settlement agreement is based upon the parties’ ability to pay, requiring Veni-Express to pay $100,000, with additional payments contingent upon the sale of company property. Myrna Steinbaum will pay $25,000, while Sonny Steinbaum will contribute $10,000.

Whistleblower Involvement

The whistleblowers in the qui tam actions were a former phlebotomist and a laboratory technical director. The qui tam provision in the False Claims Act allows private citizens with knowledge of fraud to report fraud schemes to the government and share in the government’s recovery.

Implications for Healthcare Professionals

This whistleblower settlement serves as a cautionary tale for healthcare professionals, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to regulatory standards. It underscores the power industry insiders have to speak up and put an end to fraud schemes that taint the healthcare profession.

© 2024 by Tycko & Zavareei LLP by: Tycko & Zavareei Whistleblower Practice Group of Tycko & Zavareei LLP For more on Whistleblowers, visit the NLR Criminal Law Business Crimes section.

  • Related Posts

    How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

    The January 1, 2025 filing deadline under the CTA for filing beneficial ownership information reports (BOI reports) for reporting companies formed prior to January 1, 2024 is rapidly approaching. January…

    AI Transcripts and Investment Advisers: Embracing Technology While Meeting SEC Requirements

    AI Transcripts in Investment Advisory There has been a boom recently regarding investment advisers’ use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) to transcribe client and internal meetings. Among other applications, AI features…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    E. Coli Outbreak Linked to Carrots: Symptoms, Risks, and Recalled Brands

    • By admin
    • November 21, 2024
    • 5 views

    How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

    • By admin
    • November 20, 2024
    • 4 views
    How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Little Changed as Investors Await Nvidia Earnings Report; Bitcoin Hits Another Record High

    • By admin
    • November 20, 2024
    • 4 views

    AI Transcripts and Investment Advisers: Embracing Technology While Meeting SEC Requirements

    • By admin
    • November 20, 2024
    • 5 views
    AI Transcripts and Investment Advisers: Embracing Technology While Meeting SEC Requirements

    Daily Walks Could Help You Live Over a Decade Longer

    • By admin
    • November 20, 2024
    • 5 views

    Trump Administration Tariffs: Considerations for U.S. and Global Companies

    • By admin
    • November 20, 2024
    • 6 views
    Trump Administration Tariffs: Considerations for U.S. and Global Companies