9th Circuit Finds ‘Fruit Naturals’ Label Not Deceptive

  • The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a class action alleging that Del Monte Foods, Inc., falsely advertised its “Fruit Naturals” fruit cups as “natural” despite containing synthetic preservatives. The original lawsuit was filed in early 2023 and dismissed in October of that year.
  • The fruit cups, which are labeled as “Fruit Naturals,” contain ingredients like potassium sorbate and methylcellulose gum. According to the plaintiff, Del Monte did not disclose that these ingredients are synthetic, and consumers are not “expected or required to ‘scour’ a product’s listed ingredients” to determine whether products are, in fact, natural. However, the district court found that, because the ingredients are specifically listed on the back label, the label was not “unambiguously deceptive” because the “front label, as clarified by the back label, [would not] mislead a reasonable consumer into thinking that the products don’t contain synthetic ingredients.”
  • In affirming the district court ruling, a 9th Circuit panel found that a survey cited by the plaintiff to support the deceptive nature of the label was uninformative because it asked respondents about the adjective “natural,” rather than the noun “naturals.” Here, the word is used as a noun in the name of the product. Further, the label depicts the picture and name of the fruit in the cups followed by the phrase “in extra light syrup.” This conveys that the fruit itself is natural, but the syrup may not be.
  • According to the panel, the labels are ambiguous, meaning that “’reasonable consumers would necessarily require more information before they could reasonably conclude’ that the front label makes a specific factual representation.” A reasonable consumer would look to the back label, which, here, “accurately and clearly discloses several synthetic ingredients,” thus resolving the ambiguity.

© 2024 Keller and Heckman LLP by: Food and Drug Law at Keller and Heckman of Keller and Heckman LLP For more on Labels, visit the NLR Biotech Food Drug section

  • Related Posts

    Tax and Disclosure Considerations Related to Executive Security Benefits

    Key Takeaways Executives and companies may deduct the cost of security benefits that meet certain requirements under the Treasury Regulations Public companies are generally required to disclose the cost of…

    Congress Passes Defense Bill with AI Provisions — AI: The Washington Report

    On December 18, Congress passed the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes a number of AI provisions. The NDAA is expected to be signed into law by…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Slide in Early Trading as Nvidia, Tesla Lead Large-Cap Tech Shares Lower

    • By admin
    • December 27, 2024
    • 2 views

    How ‘Weekend Warrior’ Workouts Can Jumpstart Your 2025 Fitness Goals

    • By admin
    • December 27, 2024
    • 4 views
    How ‘Weekend Warrior’ Workouts Can Jumpstart Your 2025 Fitness Goals

    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Slip in Early Trading as Santa Clause Rally Stumbles; Bitcoin Slumps

    • By admin
    • December 26, 2024
    • 4 views
    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Slip in Early Trading as Santa Clause Rally Stumbles; Bitcoin Slumps

    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Inch Higher To Start Holiday-Shortened Session

    • By admin
    • December 24, 2024
    • 15 views
    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Inch Higher To Start Holiday-Shortened Session

    Tax and Disclosure Considerations Related to Executive Security Benefits

    • By admin
    • December 24, 2024
    • 11 views

    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Slip To Start Holiday-Shortened Week; Honda Soars on Merger Plans

    • By admin
    • December 23, 2024
    • 14 views
    Dow Jones Today: Stocks Slip To Start Holiday-Shortened Week; Honda Soars on Merger Plans